Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Tasman Ian De Ville Holdings Ltd. (TIDH) - Best Samples by Expert
  Question:    Mr. de Ville, the owner of Tasman Ian de Ville Holdings Ltd. (TIDH) has asked you to evaluate five investment projects. TIDH has a $10,000,000 investment budget, an investment hurdle rate of 11.0 %, and the owner has a requirement that all investments have a Payback Period (PBP) of under 3.5 years. Also, Project 2 brings the offices and warehouse up to the current fire code and the listed savings are the facilitation payments that will no longer need to be made to inspectors to avoid the office being shut-down.          Year end      Project 1      Project 2      Project 3      Project 4      Project 5          01      -$830,000      -$200,000      -$850,000      -$5,000,000      -$350,000          02            100,000      350,000      800,000      350,000          03            100,000      500,000      800,000      350,000          04            100,000      700,000      800,000      350,000          05                        800,000      -2,650,000          06-30      1,000,000                  800,000      350,000              Answer:              Statement showing Net Present Value and Pay back period of each project:                                                                      Year      Pvf @ 11%      Project 1      Project 2      Project 3      Project 4      Project 5          Cash Flow      Cumulative Cash flow      Present Value      Cash Flow      Cumulative Cash flow      Present Value      Cash Flow      Cumulative Cash flow      Present Value      Cash Flow      Cumulative Cash flow      Present Value      Cash Flow      Cumulative Cash flow      Present Value          01      0.900901      $ -830,000      $ -830,000      $ -747,748      $ -200,000      $ -200,000      $ -180,180      $ -850,000      $ -850,000      $ -765,766      $ -5,000,000      $ -5,000,000      $ -4,504,505      $ -350,000      $ -350,000      $ -315,315          02      0.811622        $ -830,000      $ -      $ 100,000      $ -100,000      $ 81,162      $ 350,000      $ -500,000      $ 284,068      $ 800,000      $ -4,200,000      $ 649,298      $ 350,000      $ -      $ 284,068          03      0.731191        $ -830,000      $ -      $ 100,000      $ -      $ 73,119      $ 500,000      $ -      $ 365,596      $ 800,000      $ -3,400,000      $ 584,953      $ 350,000      $ 350,000      $ 255,917          04      0.658731        $ -830,000      $ -      $ 100,000      $ 100,000      $ 65,873      $ 700,000      $ 700,000      $ 461,112      $ 800,000      $ -2,600,000      $ 526,985      $ 350,000      $ 700,000      $ 230,556          05      0.593451        $ -830,000      $ -                                  $ 800,000      $ -1,800,000      $ 474,761      $ -2,650,000      $ -1,950,000      $ -1,572,646          06-30      4.997896      $ 1,000,000      $ 170,000      $ 4,997,896                                  $ 800,000      $ -1,000,000      $ 3,998,316      $ 350,000      $ -1,600,000      $ 1,749,263              Conclusion:  The Net present value of each project is positive and hence, Mr. de Ville is recommended to make investment in each project.  However, only Project 2 and 3 have a pay-back period of 3 Years and all others Project 1, 4 and 5 have payback period of more than 6 Years.  Hence, the owner's requirement for pay-back period is not fulfilled as per the requirements of Mr. de Ville.    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.